Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Marble Sorter!

It's been quite a while, since I've made a blog post:

Marble Sorter:  Principles of Engineering

(Achievements Earned so Far:  13)

Introduction:
   
     Over the past two weeks, our group (Me, Patrick, and Jordan) all have been working on producing a machine, that can seperate three different types of marbles (Metal, Wood, and Glass Marbles) swiftly.  Our group has focused on expiditing the process, in terms of speed, over achieving success of multiple types of marbles.  Origionally, we were going to use the 'RoboPRO' software to accomplish this, but after technical difficulties, we have decided to attempt this project without using any machinery.

How it Works:

     Marbles are placed on a "ramp", which then puts it on two inclined rods.  With a very small angle (~5-8 degrees), the marbles roll slowly.  Since the wooden and metal marbles are smaller then the glass marbles, they fall through towards the end.  The glass marbles then roll into a bin, and sit there.  (Had we any time to add in something, which could sort between the glass marbles, that process would've occured then).

     The wooden and metal marbles then fall a short distance, after falling out of the two rods.  There are magnets placed, which "push" the metal marbles a short distance.  These metal marbles are pushed just enough, to "hit" a small piece of plastic, which negates much of the velocity.  The metal marbles then are collected, in a small "bin".  The wooden marbles, however, just continue to fall, and they land in another bin.

     Through this process, we have expedited the sorting of these fifteen marbles.  What normally would've taken atleast a minute, was able to be accomplished in less then 15 seconds.

Pictures of the Machine:


 
This is the Side View of our design.  Here, you can see the three "tiers", where the marbles land.  The Glass Marbles land in the top area, and the wooden marbles fall to the bottom.  The metal marbles, are pushed via. magnetic strength, into a middle tier.

 
This is a "Top View" of the design.  you can directly see where the wooden basket is, as it is directly below the metal rods.  One interesting thing with the metal rods, is that the rods are very stable.  They move very little, and as such, modifications to this portion of the design rarely occur.  You can also see where the glass marbles land.  View of the Mteal Marbles is obstructed.

This is a "Front View" of the design.  It is hard to see where the baskets specifically are. The "Tiers" of landing is much more apparent here.
 

An attempted Isometric View of the design.  The Metal basket is much more apparent here, and the wooden basket is hidden.
 

Video of Marble Sorting Process:



Reiteration and Progress:

Our origional design was going to rely primarily off of using the robotics equipment.  To sort the marbles, I was planning on using the photoelectric emitter, to notice the changes in the marbles.  After a week of procrastination, I developed the iron rod system, which seperates the glass marbles from the wooden and metal marbles.  Eventually, the origional idea was scrapped.

Our hopper, which I was developing during 5th period (We weren't doing that much in History, and my teacher permitted me to come here), was converted to a small ramp, and the collection of glass marbles.  About a week ago, we took the design, and increased the height of it (Roughly by a large metal rodlength).  By thursday, we were able to add the magnetic strength, and it was perfected by Friday.  The final touches to this, were added on the day of the Final Examination.  It has roughly about a 70% chance, of successfully seperating all fifteen marbles.

Achievements:

Total Achievements (So Far):  13


Organize It! (Earned 1):  I believe, that this blog post is more then adequate, for this project.

I've made a few Special Modifications (Earned 1):  As you can see, in the "Reiteration and Progress" section, the design has gone through a large ammount of change, over the past two weeks.

Final Implementation (Earned 1):  See Above.

Final Implementation (Video) (Earned 1): See above.

Speed Achievements (Earned 7):  There are seven possible achievements for this, ranging from finishing it in 2:00, to 0:30.  We completely finished in fifteen seconds, and as such, we have achieved all of these achievements.

Hopper Achievements (Earned 2):  A Makeshift hopper was made, out of a paper cup.  It is able to accept marbles dropped from a height of one foot.  The marbles will then roll to the bottom of the cup, and hit the bottom, thus losing it's momentum.  It will then roll out of the bottom of the cup, at a slightly faster velocity, compared to the manual insertion.  Since momentum is lost when the metal and wooden marbles drop, this will not effect the design.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Cardboard Canoes! [Under Construction] [10 Achievements]

I Earned 11 Achievemtns on this challenge.

Information for the Achievements obtained from:

http://creativeproblemsolvers.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-3rd-annual-chs-cardboard-canoe.html


An additional note, many of these achievements are viewed quantitatively, rather then qualitatively. (Direct Calculations, rather then physical observations).
Achievments:
  1. Criteria and Constraints
  2. Sketch Ideas
  3. Buid it!
  4. The Longest
  5. Balence Master
  6. Videographer
  7. Surface Area
  8. Select an Approach
  9. How Low did you Go
  10. Feedback
  11. Make-Your-Own-Achievement
*Criteria and Constraints*
Criteria:
Build a watercraft that allows you to traverse the CHS swimming pool.
     -Our boat that our group built did float in the pool, and it was able to cross the pool thrice.
Your "boat" must float at least one student through the course of the competition.
     -We were able to float Morgan in our group accross the pool.  At one point, I was able to stand in it.  Our boat sunk, due to balence, after we tried fitting two people in it.
Protect your workspace from damage!
     -We successfully protected our design.

Constraints
You may only use Cardboard and Duct Tape for this event.
     -Only Cardboard and Duct Tape was used.  Four and-a-half rolls were used (One was brought, the other three-and-a-half were given to us by Mr. Olson.
All Staples or other foreign material must be removed from your cardboard. If we trash the pool, we will not be invited back for other activities during the year (yes, we have other activities in mind for 2nd semester).
     -The only 'Foreign Object' that was on our cardboard was some tape, left over from moving.
Cardboard must meet our quality standard and be approved by the instructor (more info to follow)
     -Cardboard met the standards.  I brought in much of the cardboard, that our group [and class] used.
Each boat must have a minimum of a 3" tall "sidewall" (no completely flat designs).
     -Our boat had roughly an 18" tall "sidewall", which was roughly submerged halfway.
All exposed cardboard must be covered in duct tape (this will reduce cardboard disintigration in the pool).
     -The boat was thoroughly covered, and only after it's christening in the pool, was some cardboard uncovered.
Each team will be provided one "versa table" cardboard box piece and three 60yrd rolls of duct tape. Any materials beyond this (likely need more cardboard) need to be resourced by your team.     -The "Versa Table" cardboard box piece was not used, and four rolls of duct tape were granted to us.  A fifth roll was supplied by me.

Implied Constraints
*Design must fit through the door.  This is a constraint on the size of the boat itself.  If it cannot fit through the door, it won't be able to race.
*The design itself should float.  This is to prevent "Submarine"-esque boats, which could potentially be dangerous.
*No sabotage.  Self Explanatory.

*Sketch Ideas*
-Below are three pages of brainstorming notes.-
*Design used is on the bottom right*
This design had not exactly a "v-shaped" bottom, but the hull held angles.  In this sketch, it was roughly 30 degrees.  This is provided so that is the boat was to be unbalanced, it would prevent capsizing.  As well, with this design, it was meant to be longer, with a flat hull.  This would make it length-wise like a canoe, so that the design would be ballanced laterally, like a canoe.
*Design used is the middle design*
This design was meant to [literally] match that of a pirate dighny.  Flat, small walls, yet balence.  The round design would equally balence the pressure, resulting in little heel.  The pointed bow would make it somewhat aerodynamic, making the force needed to push it less.  With the balence and speed, thin walls would make the overall weight of the boat less, making it be a tiny bit more buoyant, and easier to push.















*Design Used is the top-right-ish one*
This style of boat would've taken the longest to produce, yet it would have had the best balence.  The outriggers, if constructed properly, would keep the hull barely in the water, making it glide on the water.  As well, this would make the balence of the boat perfect, allowing for balence achievements (The Longest, Standing in the Canoe, etc.), rather then speed or distance.  A flat bottom could as well be used.  Only downside to this design, would be if water got into the outriggers, which would act as a weight on the boat, sinnking it.

*Select an Approach*
With our designs sketched, our group discussed [for quite awhile] the sketches.

+ - Most of these designs focus on balence.  Thus sacraficing speed for durability, these designs would focus more on the non-speed/distance competitions.  As such, our group later on won the longest-afloat award, and we were able to stand in our design.

Δ - With many of these designs, most of them were a bit on the complicated side.  For example, the top-right design on the bottom-most sketch, would've required much work to create the outriggers.  Even then, if just one part of the design here would leak, the entire outrigger would sink, and cause the boat to sink.

 ? - Despite being built for balence, many of these designs could have been modified for an increase of speed.  Should our group sacrafice a broader stern for a sleeker hull?  Should we add a point, to move the water, while decreasing surface area?  In the end, our group chose balence over speed; Brains, over brawns.

! - To be frank, I am suprised that our design floated as well as it did.  Literally, a box placed in water floated better then other designs constructed.  As well, our hull did not take on much water; only after falling in, did the hull begin to deteriorate. 


*Surface Area*
Our group used roughly 4 and a half rolls of Duct Tape.  Out of these, one was brought from home, and the other three and a half were supplied in class.

Each roll used was 60 yards [180 Feet] in length. The rolls were roughly 1.875 inches (1 7/8ths) wide. This would mean that each roll would be (1.875" x 2160"), which is 28 1/8 square feet (4050 square inches).  With four rolls and a half rolls used, this would make a grand total of 126.5625 square feet (126 9/16 square feet).

Although a little over 125 square feet of duct tape was present, not all of it was used.  Substituting in a 3 percent margin of error (+-3%), we will assume that 122.765625 (122 49/64 square feet), and will be approxomated as 122.75 square feet.

Our team wasn't entirely efficient with the duct tape.  Assuming that an 80% efficiency was present with the duct tape, then this would make be (0.80 x 122.75), this would make it 98.2 square feet of space.  Assuming that each pane is double-taped (both sides of cardboard), then roughly 49.1 square feet of cardboard would be covered.  This would roughly be a 7'x7' space of cardboard, double taped.

*Build it!*
Our group did build a design, which was different then most of our sketches.
[Pictures Comming Soon]

*The Longest*
Our design was the last one in the pool, and, for the most part, the least destroyed.  The entire event was filmed, if reference is needed.

*Balence Master*
I [Daniel] was able to balance myself in the boat, and was able to stand in it for ~25 seconds; most of this time was spent holding onto the rails of the boat.  I was able to freely stand for a few seconds.

*Videographer*
My mom was able to record the entire Cardboard Canoe event.  I will post the video, if I can, onto the blog.

*How Low did you Go?*
-Calculations done via Water Displacement Calculations; using mass rather then volume-

[For most of the Trials], Morgan was the person in our boat.  Morgan weighed roughly 100lbs.  Considering that one cubic foot weighs roughly 62.5 pounds, then morgan would displace (100/62.5 lbs) roughly 1.6 cubic feet of space.  Our design 's blueprints consisted of a 27"x36"x18" design, which gives us 17,496 cubic inches, which correlates to 10.125 cubic feet.

Considering that Morgan displaces as much as 1.6 cubic feet of space, and there are 10.125 cubic feet total, then Morgan displaces rougly 15.8% (.158025) of the total volume.  This would mean that Morgan's displacement makes the boat sink roughly 2.8445 inches. 

If one factors in the weight of duct tape, assuming that the rolls weigh ~1.5 pounds, with 4 and a half rolls used, this adds an aditional 6.75 pounds, this would displace an additional .108 cubic feet, this would make the total mass 1.708 cubic feet, which corresponds to about 16.87% of the boat submerged, which would result in 3.0366 inches of the boat submerged, an additional 0.1919 inches being submerged.  These calculations do not factor in the weight of the cardboard, or the mass of the air within the box, although these would proboably effect the overall mass of the boat less.
*Feedback*

+ - To be frank, I'm supprised that our boat was as buoyant as it was.  What we lacked in strength, we made up in stability.  By not having outriggers above the water, which was one of the causes of our disaster last year, and having them underwater, it helped quite a bit with balencing the boat.  This year's project was a huge improvement over last year's.

Δ - Looking back, we really could have used a pointed bow.  The blunt bow made it much less aerodynamic, and this would have made it much easier to push the boat.  If a bow was added, and it reflected the same  buoyancy as the rest of the boat, then we could have potentially placed second or first in the regatta.

? - If I could do this project again, using the same resources; I'd make the hull longer, and not as broad.  A rectangle, rather then a square.  Although if I do this, I would have to make additional cuts/creases rather then the default cardboard reams, which could lead to water comming in.

! - I'm suprised at the durribility of the boat.  It was not only rigid, but it it was watertight; no water leaked into the boat, until the multi-person attempts were conducted.  Looks like those additional few rolls of duct tape paid off in the long run.

*Make your Own Achievement!*[Achievement Earned = Industrious]

In our first few days of the class, we did not accomplish much; in the week prior to the event, we worked literally as much as we could during the class periods.  The time which we missed in the first few days was quickly made up, as we finished the boat, with some time to spare.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Mousetrap Racecars (Under Construction)

Mousetrap Racecar: (Achievements Earned so Far: 5)

What is our Racecar?

The Racecar is [meant] to use the direct force from the mousetrap to power the car in a short spurt; acceletation over distance.  After going through many, many changes, the car has gone through many changes.  The mousetrap can either be stationary on the ground, or can be supported in a sub-chasis.  The car itself, depending if the mousetrap is in/out of the car, has two different centers of balence.  Thus, it will be able to "tilt" foward or backwards, almost as a teeter totter.  As well, the car can be taken apart, giving a small uneven car, or a large teeter-totter.

Sadly, the mousetrap has been farily unsuccessfull, as the car itself has many faults.  The brute force of the mousetrap would cause it to be dislodged, and not directly power the car.  If it did, it would be unpredictable, and would occassionaly pop up in the air.  This fault is proboably from not attatching the mousetrap to the car properly, and not having enough string present for a proper wind-up.


Achievements:

Building Achievements:

Build It:


The Price of Glory:
*Independent Car*
Iron Bar - 2
Small Wheel - 3
Rubber Wheel Part - 1
Large Wheel - 2
Yelow Connecter Rods (1x6) - 5
Large Corner Rods (1x8) - 2
Red Connecter Pieces - 10

Cost for Independent Chasis: $25

*Dependent Car Part*
Iron Bar - 1
Small Wheel - 2
Yellow Connecter Rods (1x6) - 3
Large Corner Rods (1x8) - 2
Red Connecter Pieces - 6

Cost for Dependent Chasis: $14

*Mousetrap Chasis*
Yellow Connecter Rod (1x6) - 4
Yellow Corner Rod (1x4) - 2
Red Connecter Pieces - 8

Cost for Alternate Chasis Car: $14

*Alternate Parts*
Mousetrap - 1
String (24") - 1

Cost for Alternate Parts: $2

Total Cost for Car: $50

Design Stage:
-Note: During the first day or so of class, I was in Sean's Team.  I did split off during the construction stage, and formed my own group.

Braniac: [Note: Done in Sean's Group]
There is a list of 10 designs that Me, Timmy, and Sean brainstormed.  However, I can't find the list.  Sean or Timmy has the list.

Visualize It!:
-Comming Soon-

Racing Achievements:

Compete:
Due to technical reasons, my mousetrap racecar couldn't compete in the distance races.  I was able to atleast get it working, and I did compete in the Acceleration Contest.  After 3 attempts, in which no car crossed the  line, I somehow got a test in, and beat "Team Catapult".  Thus, I [technically] got 4th place out of 7 cars.

Feedback:
-Coming Soon-

Iterate Stage:

Cleanup Stage:

Leave it Cleaner Then You Found It:
I did my best to thoroughly help to clean each day [On Thursdays, I do have to leave early, because of Sailing Practice], and I personally believe that I have cleaned the workplace, and kept my workspace in a good condition.
Reflection Stage:

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Minecraft Architecture [INCOMPLETE]

This house is bassed off of both "Frank Llyod Wright" and "Mies Van der Rohe".  It features minamalist structure on the outside, and contains natural lighting (Light comes in and fill the house completely).  There is also a river going through the house, suiting the room.

Monday, May 14, 2012

CAD 3.1.1 (0/5 Done)

Engineering CAD 3.1.1

(0/5 currently done)
*Note: This is done using pictures from the Internet Primarily, not from the classroom.  Items used would be things found in a normal classroom.

Product 1:

Product Owner:
Product Name:
Product Elements:
Product Principles:

Product 2:

Product Owner:
Product Name:
Product Elements:
Product Principles:

Product 3:

Product Owner:
Product Name:
Product Elements:
Product Principles:

Product 4:

Product Owner:
Product Name:
Product Elements:
Product Principles:

Product 5:

Product Owner:
Product Name:
Product Elements:
Product Principles:

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

CAD 2.3.1.a Train (FINSIHED)

Over the past few weeks, I have been working on creating the train, from CAD 2.3.1.a. I have finally finished the train, and now, you can see my progress:

Part 1: (Train Chasis)











Part 2: (Smokestack)












Part 3: (Hitch Magnet)












Part 4: (Hitch Peg)












Part 5: (Wheel)























Part 6: (Axel Peg)












Part 7: (Linkage Arm)












Part 8: (Linkage Peg)












Part 9: (Cow Catcher)






















Tracks:













Final Train:

Thursday, March 22, 2012

EGG DROP (NOT FINISHED)

Achievements:

Brainstorming:
-Create a Sketch of One Possible Solution.  Include Labels.
-Create a Sketch of another possible solution.  Include Labels.
-Create a Sketch of a third possible solution.  Include Labels.

Material Prep:
-Generate a List of Materials required for Build Day (Completed for Sketch #3)

Build Achievements:
-Materials fit inside a Printer Paper Box (Possible?)

Material Weight:
-Materials weigh less than 500 grams.

Drop Accuracy!:
-You hit the Butcher Paper!
-You hit the Third Ring!
-You hit the Second Ring!
-You hit the First Ring!
-You hit the Bullseye!

Egg Resilience:
-Your Egg Didn't break in any way! (awarded 3x)

Calculation Achievements:
-Describe an aspect of the event using Arithmetic. (Proboablitiy/Ratio's)
-Describe an aspect of the event using Geometry. (Trigonometry [A division of Trigonometry])
-Describe an aspect of the event using Algebra. (Graphing on a 2d plane: Quadratics)
-Describe an aspect of the event using Calculus. (Polar Coordinates)
-Seek out additional instruction.... (Asked for what to do for Calculus)